Female Representation in Movies

Think of your favorite movie.

Now try to name as many characters from that film as you can.

Write their names in a column, male on one side, female on the other.

What do you see?

Chances are the list of male names is about twice as long as the list of females. Why is that? In the world there are roughly the same amount of men and women, shouldn’t a movie represent that? Shouldn’t it at least be somewhat similar to reality? While that seems logical, a study by the Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film has confirmed that in 2014[1] just about 30% of all characters in movies, and only 12% of protagonists, were female. You could of course ask why it is that way. It’s a valid question. It doesn’t represent real life. And while that may make sense for some movies taking place in universes that have nothing to do with our reality, it certainly doesn’t for most.

However, there is not only a difference in number of roles, there is also a difference of representation. The majority of female characters were in their 20s or 30s, while the male characters were older, in their 30s and 40s. 53% of all male characters were 40+ years old. Again, looking at the population, that doesn’t really make sense.

Additionally, the occupation of a male character is more often known than that of a female one, and a substantially larger portion of male characters were seen actually working.

Looking at the data from the study, an interesting pattern can be found. In films where there was at least one female director or writer, 39% of protagonists were female, 35% were male and 26% were male/female ensembles. This was very different for films with exclusively male directors and writers. In those movies only 4% (!) of protagonists were female, 87% were male and 9% were ensembles. This seems strange, doesn’t it?  What could a reason for such a difference be?

There is another point that cannot really be measured by such a study as it is intuitive and can be indirectly concluded from the investigation of character development. Very often, the female character of a movie will seem shallow and not quite as human as a male character. It is harder for fans to identify with female characters seeing as, oftentimes, they are just not as well written as the male ones.

Many things can be inferred from this information, but it seems to me that this is clear evidence that internalized sexism in the film industry is still very much present and alive, perhaps much subtler than it used to be, but nonetheless still a problem and something that should be discussed and not kept silent.[2]


[1] The most recent update

[2] I am very aware that this is only an incredibly small, almost ludicrous, problem in comparison to the real dangers women in many countries are in, but it is a way to show that even in MEDCs, there is still a lot to be done in the quest for equality. Movies are a portrayal of reality that can paraphrase and reflect real situations in a different way.

4 thoughts on “Female Representation in Movies”

  1. Dear Heda,
    This is a really good blog post. It is very interesting and I didn’t know about these big differences between male and female in the movie industry. It is really important that people get information about this problem and are aware that this is the reality.
    I really liked your entry!

  2. Your post just describes the sad and sexist world we live in. Women in the movie industry are often displayed as object. As a funny, attractive, and young side-kick which depends on the man, the main protagonist. It doesn’t represent the real women. Those who are out there working independently. And people are supporting this sickening and offensive ideology… For example, did you knew that Penny from “The Big Bang Theory”, has no last name? Instead they gave her a meaningless and degrading name; Penny.


Leave a Reply